HOW TO MAKE WISE DECISIONS
Across cultures, wisdom has been considered one of the most revered human qualities. Although the truly wise may seem few and far between, empirical research examining wisdom suggests that it isn’t an exceptional trait possessed by a small handful of bearded philosophers after all – in fact, the latest studies suggest that most of us have the ability to make wise decisions, given the right context.
‘It appears that experiential, situational, and cultural factors are even more powerful in shaping wisdom than previously imagined,’ says Associate Professor Igor Grossmann of the University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada. ‘Recent empirical findings from cognitive, developmental, social, and personality psychology cumulatively suggest that people’s ability to reason wisely varies dramatically across experiential and situational contexts. Understanding the role of such contextual factors offers unique insights into understanding wisdom in daily life, as well as how it can be enhanced and taught.’
It seems that it’s not so much that some people simply possess wisdom and others lack it, but that our ability to reason wisely depends on a variety of external factors. ‘It is impossible to characterize thought processes attributed to wisdom without considering the role of contextual factors,’ explains Grossmann. ‘In other words, wisdom is not solely an “inner quality” but rather unfolds as a function of situations people happen to be in. Some situations are more likely to promote wisdom than others.’
Coming up with a definition of wisdom is challenging, but Grossmann and his colleagues have identified four key characteristics as part of a framework of wise reasoning. One is intellectual humility or recognition of the limits of our own knowledge, and another is appreciation of perspectives wider than the issue at hand. Sensitivity to the possibility of change in social relations is also key, along with compromise or integration of different attitudes and beliefs.
Grossmann and his colleagues have also found that one of the most reliable ways to support wisdom in our own day-to-day decisions is to look at scenarios from a third-party perspective, as though giving advice to a friend. Research suggests that when adopting a first-person viewpoint we focus on ‘the focal features of the environment’ and when we adopt a third-person, ‘observer’ viewpoint we reason more broadly and focus more on interpersonal and moral ideals such as justice and impartiality. Looking at problems from this more expansive viewpoint appears to foster cognitive processes related to wise decisions.
What are we to do, then, when confronted with situations like a disagreement with a spouse or negotiating a contract at work, that require us to take a personal stake? Grossmann argues that even when we aren’t able to change the situation, we can still evaluate these experiences from different perspectives.
For example, in one experiment that took place during the peak of a recent economic recession, graduating college seniors were asked to reflect on their job prospects. The students were instructed to imagine their career either ‘as if you were a distant observer’ or ‘before your own eyes as if you were right there’. Participants in the group assigned to the ‘distant observer’ role displayed more wisdom-related reasoning (intellectual humility and recognition of change) than did participants in the control group.
In another study, couples in long-term romantic relationships were instructed to visualize an unresolved relationship conflict either through the eyes of an outsider or from their own perspective. Participants then discussed the incident with their partner for 10 minutes, after which they wrote down their thoughts about it. Couples in the ‘other’s eyes’ condition were significantly more likely to rely on wise reasoning – recognizing others’ perspectives and searching for a compromise – compared to the couples in the egocentric condition.
‘Ego-decentering promotes greater focus on others and enables a bigger picture, conceptual view of the experience, affording recognition of intellectual humility and change,’ says Grossmann.
We might associate wisdom with intelligence or particular personality traits, but research shows only a small positive relationship between wise thinking and crystallized intelligence and the personality traits of openness and agreeableness. ‘It is remarkable how much people can vary in their wisdom from one situation to the next, and how much stronger such contextual effects are for understanding the relationship between wise judgment and its social and affective outcomes as compared to the generalized “traits”,’ Grossmann explains. ‘That is, knowing how wisely a person behaves in a given situation is more informative for understanding their emotions or likelihood to forgive [or] retaliate as compared to knowing whether the person may be wise “in general”.’
Questions 27-30
Choose the correct letter, A, B, C or D.
Write the correct letter in boxes 27-30 on your answer sheet.
27. What point does the writer make in the first paragraph?
A) Wisdom appears to be unique to the human race.
B) A basic assumption about wisdom may be wrong.
C) Concepts of wisdom may depend on the society we belong to.
D) There is still much to be discovered about the nature of wisdom.
28. What does Igor Grossmann suggest about the ability to make wise decisions?
A) It can vary greatly from one person to another.
B) Earlier research into it was based on unreliable data.
C) The importance of certain influences on it was underestimated.
D) Various branches of psychology define it according to their own criteria.
29. According to the third paragraph, Grossmann claims that the level of wisdom an individual shows
A) can be greater than they think it is.
B) will be different in different circumstances.
C) may be determined by particular aspects of their personality.
D) should develop over time as a result of their life experiences.
30. What is described in the fifth paragraph?
A) a difficulty encountered when attempting to reason wisely
B) an example of the type of person who is likely to reason wisely
C) a controversial view about the benefits of reasoning wisely
D) a recommended strategy that can help people to reason wisely
Questions 31-35
Complete the summary using the list of words, A-J, below.
Write the correct letter, A-J, in boxes 31-35 on your answer sheet.
The characteristics of wise reasoning
Igor Grossmann and colleagues have established four characteristics which enable us to make wise decisions. It is important to have a certain degree of 31 ………………….. regarding the extent of our knowledge, and to take into account 32 ………………….. which may not be the same as our own. We should also be able to take a broad 33 ………………….. of any situation. Another key characteristic is being aware of the likelihood of alterations in the way that people relate to each other.
Grossmann also believes that it is better to regard scenarios with 34 ………………….. . By avoiding the first-person perspective, we focus more on 35 ………………….. and on other moral ideals, which in turn leads to wiser decision-making.
A opinions B confidence C view
D modesty E problems F objectivity
G fairness H experiences I range
J reasons
Questions 36-40
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 3?
In boxes 36-40 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
36. Students participating in the job prospects experiment could choose one of two perspectives to take.
37. Participants in the couples experiment were aware that they were taking part in a study about wise reasoning.
38. In the couples experiments, the length of the couples’ relationships had an impact on the results.
39. In both experiments, the participants who looked at the situation from a more detached viewpoint tended to make wiser decisions.
40. Grossmann believes that a person’s wisdom is determined by their intelligence to only a very limited extent.
LỜI GIẢI CHI TIẾT
27. What point does the writer make in the first paragraph?
Answer: B
– A basic assumption about wisdom may be wrong. First paragraph’s first line from end. “Although the truly wise may seem few ……, given
the right context” Here, the writer discussed that wisdom is not something they assumed of; in fact, it is something else. The meaning of the
lines is that wisdom seems to be possessed by a few people (assumption), but in reality, most of us have ability to make wise decision. Hence, the assumption related to wisdom may be wrong.
28. What does Igor Grossmann suggest about the ability to make wise decisions?
Answer: C
– The importance of certain influences on it was underestimated. Second paragraph’s first line. “It appears that experiential, situational, and
cultural factors are even more powerful in shaping wisdom than previously imagined,’ says Associate Professor Igor Grossmann…” Igor
Grossmann said that certain factors are more powerful than previously imagined. Hence, their importance was underestimated.
29. According to the third paragraph, Grossmann claims that the level of wisdom an individual shows
Answer: B
– will be different in different circumstances. Third paragraph’s fifth line. “Some situations are more likely to promote wisdom than others.”
Thus, it is clearly given that wisdom changes according to situation. Situation = circumstance. It is claimed by Grossmann.
30. What is described in the fifth paragraph?
Answer: D
– a recommended strategy that can help people to reason wisely. Fifth paragraph’s 3rd line to the end of this paragraph. “Research suggests
that when……….related to wise decisions.” In these lines, the writer described about a research that suggests that if we see the situation like an observer, then we make judgments more broadly. So the strategy is to act as a third person (observer), not first person to make wise decision.
Questions 31-35. Complete the summary using the list of words, A-J, below.
The characteristics of wise reasoning
31. It is important to have a certain degree of ………. regarding the extent of our knowledge,
Answer: D (modesty)
– Fourth paragraph, second line. “One is intellectual humility or recognition of the limits of our knowledge…” Limit = Extent.
Humility = Modesty. Hence, a certain degree of humility is required
32. and to take into account ………. which may not be the same as our own.
Answer: A (opinion)
– Fourth paragraph’s last line. “along with compromise or integration of different attitudes and beliefs” belief = Opinion. Integration
of different attitudes and belief means we should include different opinions of others.
33. We should also be able to take a broad ………. of any situation.
Answer: C (view)
– Fifth paragraph’s 3rd line. “and another is appreciation of perspectives wider than the issue at hand.” Perspective = view (word given
in the box). Wider = Broad. The meaning of these lines is that we should take wider view of situation.
34. Grossmann also believes that it is better to regard scenarios with ………. .
Answer: F (objectivity)
– Fifth paragraph’s first line to 3rd line, “Grossmann and his colleagues have also found……giving advice to a friend.” To know this
question’s answer, you must know the meaning of “Objectivity”. Objective = of a person or judgment not influenced by personal feelings or
opinions in considering and representing facts. So it is better to regard scenarios with objectivity; it can be done by looking at scenario from a
third-party perspective, as though giving advice to a friend. Therefore, F is the answer.
35. By avoiding the first-person perspective, we focus more on ………. and on other moral ideals, which in turn leads to wiser decision-making.
Answer: G (fairness)
– Fifth paragraph’s 4th line. “when we adopt a third person, ’Observer’ viewpoint we reason more broadly and focus more on
interpersonal and moral ideals such as justice and impartiality.” Impartiality = Fairness. By reading these lines and available options, we find G (Fairness) is the best option that fits in this blank
Questions 36-40. Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 3?
(TRUE / FALSE / NOT GIVEN)
36. Students participating in the job prospects experiment could choose one of two perspectives to take.
Answer: FALSE
– Seventh paragraph’s 4th line. “Participants in the group assigned………. in the control group.” Participants were assigned with
perspective, not they could choose the role. They could only imagine their career. Hence, FALSE.
37. Participants in the couples experiment were aware that they were taking part in a study about wise reasoning.
Answer: NOT GIVEN
– There is no such information given in the passage. There is a discussion about a study on couples in the eighth paragraph, but
there is no information on whether the couples were aware or not about the experiment.
38. In the couples experiments, the length of the couples’ relationships had an impact on the results.
Answer: NOT GIVEN
– There is no such information given in the passage.
39. In both experiments, the participants who looked at the situation from a more detached viewpoint tended to make wiser decisions.
Answer: TRUE
– Seventh and eighth paragraph’s fourth line. Here, both experiments mean an experiment on students and an experiment on couples.
The fourth line of the seventh paragraph “Participants in the group assigned to the ‘distant observer’ role displayed more wisdom-related
reasoning ….”
Fourth line of the eighth paragraph “Couples in the ‘other’s eyes’ condition were significantly more likely to rely on wise reasoning …” Detached viewpoint = other’s viewpoint = distant observer. Hence, participants who viewed the situation from other’s viewpoints make wiser decisions in both experiments.
40. Grossmann believes that a person’s wisdom is determined by their intelligence to only a very limited extent.
Answer: TRUE
– Last paragraph, first line. “We might associate wisdom with intelligence or particular personality traits, but research shows only a small
positive relationship between wise thinking and crystallized intelligence ….” Small positive relationship = limited extent. Hence, the answer is TRUE.
Xem thêm: ROMAN SHIPBUILDING AND NAVIGATION
Link tải sách và lời giải chi tiết tại VietStar Centre
